Not only did you take advantage of the cheap gag I passed over, using Roman numerals to indicate 1/2, but you are incorrect. Roman numerals are inefficient and cannot display zero.
Correct. However, post duplication due to Blogger being slow is also a 1. Unfortunately, the 1 or 2 system does not allow us to determine which is worse, so we will never know.
Among other things that have been declared a 1 here: internet anonymity, corduroy, Ann Coulter.
5 Comments:
Lame. Roman Numerals are a II.
Patrick.
By Anonymous, at 1/21/2005 1:47 PM
Not only did you take advantage of the cheap gag I passed over, using Roman numerals to indicate 1/2, but you are incorrect. Roman numerals are inefficient and cannot display zero.
By Robin, at 1/21/2005 3:27 PM
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
By Robin, at 1/21/2005 11:33 PM
I agree with Robin that roman numerals are a 1.
I think it's been written that posts removed by the author are a 1.
By Anonymous, at 1/22/2005 5:26 AM
Correct. However, post duplication due to Blogger being slow is also a 1. Unfortunately, the 1 or 2 system does not allow us to determine which is worse, so we will never know.
Among other things that have been declared a 1 here: internet anonymity, corduroy, Ann Coulter.
By Robin, at 1/22/2005 6:24 AM
Post a Comment
<< Home